2026 Buyer's Guide

Best Section 106 software for CRM firms (2026)

An honest comparison of the tools CRM firms actually use to run Section 106 surveys, document historic resources, and ship SHPO-ready deliverables. Yes, this is FieldTap's site — we'll tell you when something else is the better pick.

The short answer

For most 1–50-person CRM firms running Section 106 work in 2026: FieldTap is the best tool. It's purpose-built for the workflow, it's independent (Wildnote was acquired in February 2026, raising uncertainty there), and it's the only tool that lets you digitize your state's official PDF site forms yourself instead of paying for a professional-services engagement.

If you're already deep in ArcGIS Online with paid named-user licenses, Survey123 stays viable. If you're a Fulcrum shop with engineering capacity, you can make Fulcrum work. Paper and Excel are no longer credible for firms running more than two concurrent projects.

Section 106 software, side by side

Feature by feature, against what SHPO reviewers actually require.

FeatureFieldTapWildnoteFulcrumSurvey123Paper / Excel
Purpose-built for CRM / Section 106
Offline data collection
GPS / GNSS auto-capture
External Bluetooth GNSS / RTK
Import official state PDF and auto-exportFieldTap FormMap — unique in this category
DPR 523 / IMACS form templates
Photo capture with GPS + direction
AI photo descriptions
Voice-to-text field notes
Review / approval workflow
Independent vendor (not a parent platform)n/a
Free data migration inn/an/a
30-day free trial, no credit cardn/a
Annual cost / userFieldTap Professional — list pricing$348~$625~$480AGOL license$0

Pricing reflects public list pricing as of May 2026; Survey123 cost depends on AGOL named-user licensing tier.

Only in FieldTap

FormMap: import any state PDF, map fields once, auto-export forever

Every state has its own paper site form (DPR 523, IMACS, agency ESA templates). other tools on this list either doesn't support them or wants you to pay a professional-services bill to digitize each one. FieldTap FormMap lets your firm import the official PDF, drag-map fields once, and auto-export submit-ready records for the life of your firm — no engineering, no consulting fees, no waiting.

Import
Any state PDF
Map
Once, drag & drop
Export
Submit-ready, every record

The 2026 ranking

Where each tool actually fits.

#1
FieldTap
Best overall for CRM firms in 2026. Purpose-built for archaeology, environmental, and Section 106 workflows, with a unique FormMap feature that lets you import your state's official PDF (DPR 523, IMACS, etc.) and auto-export submit-ready records — no professional services bill, no waiting on a vendor backlog.
Pros
  • Only platform that lets you self-serve digitize any state SHPO PDF
  • Section 106-aware data model — sites, isolates, components, photos all linked
  • Independent vendor focused on field-science workflows
  • 30-day free trial with no credit card
  • Free import from Wildnote, Fulcrum, Survey123
Cons
  • Smaller user community than Survey123 (younger product)
  • No native ArcGIS Online integration yet (export to shapefile/GeoJSON instead)
Best for: 1–50 person CRM firms doing Section 106 surveys, excavations, and SHPO submissions
#2
Wildnote
Long-running specialist tool for environmental and cultural resource fieldwork. Acquired by Fulcrum on February 17, 2026, which introduces meaningful uncertainty around pricing and roadmap for the next 12–24 months.
Pros
  • Mature, well-known in the CRM industry
  • Established environmental and wildlife form library
Cons
  • Acquired by Fulcrum — pricing and feature focus likely to shift
  • No FormMap-equivalent — official state PDFs require manual rebuild
  • Higher per-user cost (~$625/user/year typical)
  • Limited review and team workflows
Best for: Existing Wildnote users staying put short-term while evaluating alternatives
#3
Fulcrum
Generic data-collection platform with broad market reach. Powerful, but not built for archaeology or Section 106 — every SHPO form has to be rebuilt from scratch, and the workflows that come standard in FieldTap or Wildnote (review, provenience, components) need custom development.
Pros
  • Broad enterprise feature set
  • Strong API and integrations
  • Familiar to teams that already use it for environmental work
Cons
  • Not Section 106-aware out of the box
  • Custom form-building burden falls on each firm
  • Now owns Wildnote — potential conflict of interest for archaeology users
Best for: Firms that already standardize on Fulcrum across multiple service lines and have engineering capacity to build their own SHPO form library
#4
Esri Survey123
Field form tool that lives inside the ArcGIS ecosystem. Powerful if you're already an ArcGIS Online shop. Painful and expensive if you're not.
Pros
  • Tight integration with ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Pro
  • Strong GIS-side feature set
Cons
  • Only useful if every user has an AGOL named-user license
  • Form builder is technical (XLSForm) — high learning curve
  • Not Section 106-aware; SHPO templates must be built from scratch
  • Real cost is the AGOL license, not Survey123 itself
Best for: DOT, infrastructure, and large agencies already standardized on ArcGIS Online
#5
Paper / Excel
Still common in small CRM shops. Cheap up front, expensive in transcription, photo management, and SHPO rejections. Listed for completeness — most firms outgrow it within a year or two.
Pros
  • Zero software cost
  • Familiar to senior PIs
Cons
  • Hours of post-field transcription per site
  • Photo logs constantly out of sync with records
  • No GPS/photo metadata coupling — fail on quality reviews
  • No version control or review workflow
Best for: Solo practitioners running 1–2 small projects per year

Annual cost per user

List prices as of May 2026. Survey123 cost is the underlying ArcGIS Online named-user license.

Annual cost per user · industry comparisonPublic list pricing — per seat, billed annually.Wildnote$625/yr↓ $277/yr saved with FieldTapSurvey123 (typical)$540/yr↓ $192/yr saved with FieldTapFulcrum (with API)$480/yr↓ $132/yr saved with FieldTapiFormBuilder$420/yr↓ $72/yr saved with FieldTapFieldTap · Professional$348/yrSource: vendor list pricing as of 2026 · figures rounded · verify before publishing.

FAQ

What does 'Section 106 software' actually mean?

It's shorthand for the field data tools CRM firms use to identify, evaluate, and document historic properties under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The job-to-be-done is producing field records, photographs, GPS data, and SHPO-ready submissions that survive review and audit.

Why isn't Section 106 just a 'form filler' problem?

Because the form is the easy part. The hard parts are: linking GPS-tagged photos to the right resource, handling multi-component sites, exporting to whatever format your state SHPO actually accepts, and keeping a defensible chain of custody from field crew to final report. Generic form builders solve 30% of the problem — the FormMap + review workflow stack solves the other 70%.

What's the single most important feature for a CRM firm in 2026?

Self-service state-PDF mapping. Every state has its own forms, every state revises them, and every form revision used to mean a paid professional-services engagement. FieldTap FormMap eliminates that — and to our knowledge, no other tool on this list offers the equivalent.

How long does it take to switch tools mid-season?

Most CRM firms migrate from Wildnote/Fulcrum/Survey123 to FieldTap in under two weeks: 1–2 days to set up FormMap templates for your states, 2–3 days to pilot a real project, then a parallel run on one project before cutting over the team.

Are there any free options for Section 106 work?

Survey123 is free if you already pay for ArcGIS Online (you're paying via the AGOL license). KoBoToolbox and ODK are open-source but lack Section 106 templates and SHPO workflows. FieldTap's free trial is 30 days with no credit card if you want to evaluate end-to-end.

Try the #1-ranked Section 106 tool free

30-day free trial, free data import, no credit card.